Mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 87:4
דין הוא הואיל וחייב באיש ואשה וחייב בבן ובת מה כשחייב באיש ואשה לא חלקת בו בין תם למועד אף כשחייב בבן ובת לא תחלוק בו בין תם למועד
but how would you be able to prove the same ruling in the case of Cattle where there could be no liability for the four [additional] items? Hence it is further laid down: Whether it have gored a son or have gored a daughter to impose liability for little ones as for grown-ups. So far I know this only in the case of <i>Mu'ad</i>.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As verse 31 follows 29 and 30 which deal with Mu'ad. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Bava Kamma 87:4. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.